By Athan Theoharis
Athan Theoharis, lengthy a revered authority on surveillance and secrecy, demonstrated his recognition for meticulous scholarship together with his paintings at the loyalty protection application constructed below Truman and McCarthy. In Abuse of strength, Theoharis keeps his research of U.S. govt surveillance and historicizes the 11th of September response.
Criticizing the U.S. government's mystery actions and guidelines during times of "unprecedented crisis," he recounts how presidents and FBI officers exploited issues approximately foreign-based inner protection threats.
Drawing on info sequestered till lately in FBI files, Theoharis indicates how those mystery actions on this planet struggle II and chilly battle eras elevated FBI surveillance powers and, within the strategy, eroded civil liberties with out considerably advancing valid safety interests.
Passionately argued, this well timed booklet speaks to the prices and outcomes of still-secret post-9/11 surveillance courses and counterintelligence disasters. finally, Abuse of energy makes the case that the abusive surveillance rules of the chilly conflict years have been repeated within the government's responses to the September eleven attacks.
Read or Download Abuse of Power: How Cold War Surveillance and Secrecy Policy Shaped the Response to 9/11 PDF
Best civil rights books
You'll lower from our country's brutal historical past of lynching. Lynching is named the final nice skeleton in our nation's closet: It terrorized all of black the United States, claimed millions upon millions of sufferers within the a long time among the Eighteen Eighties and the second one international battle, and leaves invisible yet deep scars to today.
“An very good, much-needed advent to the racial, political, and financial dimensions of mass incarceration. ” —Michelle Alexander
We all recognize that orange is the recent black and mass incarceration is the hot Jim Crow, yet how a lot can we truly find out about the constitution, objectives, and effect of our felony justice process? figuring out Mass Incarceration deals the 1st complete assessment of the incarceration gear installed position by means of the world’s biggest jailer: the United States.
Drawing on a starting to be physique of educational paintings, realizing Mass Incarceration describes in simple English the various competing theories of felony justice—from rehabilitation to retribution, from restorative justice to justice reinvestment. In a full of life and available variety, writer James Kilgore illuminates the adaptation among prisons and jails, probation and parole, laying out key suggestions and guidelines comparable to the warfare on medications, broken-windows policing, three-strikes sentencing, the school-to-prison pipeline, recidivism, and felony privatization. knowledgeable by means of the the most important lenses of race and gender, he addresses matters quite often passed over from the dialogue: the quickly expanding incarceration of ladies, Latinos, and transgender humans; the becoming imprisonment of immigrants; and the devastating effect of mass incarceration on communities.
Both box advisor and primer, knowing Mass Incarceration is a necessary source for these engaged in felony justice activism in addition to these new to the topic.
Greater than in basic terms describing advancements within the box of civil liberties and human rights, this finished and tough textbook offers scholars with specified and thought-provoking insurance and research of the influence of the Human Rights Act 1998 in an period during which human rights are coming more and more stressed.
The Sovereignty of Human Rights advances a criminal conception of overseas human rights that defines their nature and function on the subject of the constitution and operation of foreign legislation. Professor Macklem argues that the challenge of overseas human rights legislation is to mitigate antagonistic outcomes produced by means of the overseas felony deployment of sovereignty to constitution worldwide politics into a world criminal order.
- The Gun Debate: What Everyone Needs to Know®
- Parliamentary Sovereignty and the Human Rights Act
- Natural Extracts Using Supercritical Carbon Dioxide
- Guide to Popular U. S. Government Documents
- Ask no questions: an international legal analysis on sexual orientation discrimination
Extra info for Abuse of Power: How Cold War Surveillance and Secrecy Policy Shaped the Response to 9/11
Federal, state, or local authorities, they contended, would wiretap to further either partisan or antiunion objectives. 13 In articulating their reason for convening hearings to investigate past wiretapping practices, which hearings extended from May 21, 1940, through February 15, 1941, members of a Subcommittee of the Senate Committee on Interstate Commerce stressed that such hearings could help determine whether further legislative safeguards were needed to deter the use of wiretaps. Senators expressed a quite different concern from that articulated by Roosevelt, Jackson, and Celler—that government agencies had used and would continue to use wiretaps to investigate the political activities and beliefs 30 / Chapter 2 of public employees and private citizens despite the ban of Section 605.
Having simply affirmed the department’s “intention,” the attorney general represented this decision as concurrence with the “Bureau’s concepts” of the emergency detention program and Security Index standards. McGranery’s willingness to ignore the legislatively mandated detention standards was not binding on his successors. Thus, following Dwight Eisenhower’s election to the presidency, FBI Director Hoover solicited the views of the new attorney general, Herbert Brownell, about the detention program’s standards and apprehension procedures.
Physical surveillance (whether by FBI agents or recruited informers) produced only limited and not always reliable information. FBI officials accordingly sought alternative means to acquire such information. And, because their objective was not to obtain evidence to prosecute but to advance intelligence, they were willing to employ intrusive, if illegal, investigative techniques—break-ins, mail opening, bugs, and wiretaps. The most controversial of them, because it was the subject of public debate, involved wiretapping.